News

USPSTF: Not enough evidence on taking supplements to prevent cardiovascular disease or cancer

BY DSN STAFF

WASHINGTON — The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force on Tuesday posted its final recommendation statement on vitamin, mineral and multivitamin supplements for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer. However, the Task Force concluded there is not enough evidence to determine the effectiveness of taking vitamins and minerals to prevent cardiovascular disease or cancer. 

Many people take vitamins and mineral supplements to improve or maintain overall health. However, this recommendation is limited to use of these vitamins and supplements specifically for the prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer, USPSTF noted. 

“Cardiovascular disease and cancer have a significant health impact in America, and we all want to find ways to prevent these diseases,” stated Task Force chair Virginia Moyer. “However, we found that there is not enough evidence to determine whether taking single or paired nutrients or a multivitamin helps to prevent cardiovascular disease or cancer.”

Additionally, there are two vitamins that the Task Force recommends against using: beta-carotene and vitamin E. “The evidence shows that there is no benefit to taking vitamin E and that beta-carotene can be harmful because it increases the risk of lung cancer in people who are already at increased risk for the disease,” commented Task Force co-chair Michael LeFevre. “Due to the uncertain benefit of vitamin supplements to prevent cardiovascular disease and cancer, health care professionals should use their best judgment and consider their patient’s health history, values, and preferences when having conversations about nutritional supplements.”

"The report’s conclusion that there is ‘…not enough evidence…’ for recommendations in the areas of cancer and cardiovascular disease should not be considered as a lack of benefit as there is a big difference between lack of research and lack of positive results," cautioned Duffy MacKay, SVP scientific and regulatory affairs for the Council for Responsible Nutrition. "Even with a current gap in the research, what few studies there were that met the USPSTF criteria pointed to a potential promise for cancer protection," he noted. "We strongly support both the need for more research and the need for the scientific community to come to terms with a rigorous approach to studying nutrition that may not reflect the current model of studying drugs."

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

TRENDING STORIES

Polls

Which area of the industry do you think Amazon's entry would shake up the most?
News

Convenient Care Association responds to AAP’s stance on retail clinics

BY Antoinette Alexander

NEW YORK — Retail-based health clinics not only work closely with local physicians and pediatricians but are also a more convenient option for parents with sick children rather than the alternative, which is often spending hours in the emergency room or waiting for an appointment with their doctor. That’s a key message that the Convenient Care Association is looking to convey in response to news that the American Academy of Pediatrics is advising parents against using retail-based health clinics.

In an updated policy statement published in the March 2014 Pediatrics, the AAP emphasizes that retail-based clinics are an inappropriate source of primary care for children because they fragment children’s health care and do not support the medical home.

The policy statement, “AAP Principles Concerning Retail-Based Clinics” released online Feb. 24, updates the Academy’s 2006 policy statement, which expressed opposition to the use of retail-based clinics.

“The AAP recognizes that convenience and access to care will continue to be important drivers of how health care is delivered,” stated James Laughlin, lead author of the policy statement. “However, the expertise of the pediatrician and the medical home should continue to be recognized as the standard for care of children, and we encourage all AAP members to provide accessible hours and locations as part of a medical home.”

Responding to AAP’s policy statement, Tine Hansen-Turton, executive director of the CCA, issued the following statement:

“There are currently more than 1,600 retail-based convenient care clinics in 39 states and the District of Columbia that have served more than 20 million consumers to date including the pediatric population. The clinics offer a quick, affordable alternative for patients with pressing, non-emergency medical needs.  Basic primary care is provided to patients aged 18 months through 65+. The clinics offer flexible hours of operation, with most of them open seven days a week-up to 12 hours a day during the workweek and up to eight hours on Saturday and Sunday, including most holidays. They are a more convenient option for parents with sick children rather than the alternative, which is often waiting for an appointment while the child is sick or spending hours in a high-cost emergency room for a minor pediatric complaint.

Retail clinics works closely with local physicians and pediatricians. They all use electronic health records (EHR) and actively encourage the sharing of visit records with a patients’ family physicians and pediatricians in order to facilitate continuity of care. Additionally, the industry is very focused on quality care and EHRs are also used in clinics to monitor evidence-based practice performance.  

In recent years, the number of CCCs and scope of services provided has grown to meet high consumer demand for easy access to high-quality, affordable health care. This is evidenced by the growth rate being highest among hospitals and health systems, and clinic operators have also entered into partnerships with many health systems to further promote continuity of care. Retail clinics are increasingly a valuable part of this nation’s healthcare ecosystem (not apart from it), providing easy access to high-quality, affordable care, connecting patients with other providers as necessary, and, increasingly, facilitating care that is being managed by other providers.”

 

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

TRENDING STORIES

Polls

Which area of the industry do you think Amazon's entry would shake up the most?
News

PwC report: Retailers need to think beyond omnichannel to achieve ‘total retail’

BY Antoinette Alexander

NEW YORK — While retailers have historically used the “multichannel” approach to reach consumers, the rapidly growing focus on the consumer and integrated, customer-focused technology has paved way for a “total retail” experience, according to a new report by PricewaterhouseCoopers.
 
Based on a survey of more than 15,000 online shoppers globally, the report, titled "Achieving Total Retail: Consumer Expectations Driving the Next Retail Business Model," reveals eight consumer expectations that call upon retailers to create a total retail business model transformation.

“Consumers now view multichannel shopping as a given, and the costs and complexities of managing a multichannel model are too great and offer too few rewards to benefit the customer experience,” stated Steven Barr, PwC’s U.S. retail and consumer practice leader. “Today’s non-stop shoppers have taken things into their own hands, becoming more tech-savvy than retailers. Consumers have the tools at their fingertips to immerse themselves into the retail brand. Our report finds that consumers have strict expectations that challenge today’s shopping experience and, in response, retailers should embrace what we at PwC are calling total retail.”

The eight key consumer expectations and business implications for retailers to help achieve the total retail model, according to PwC:

  • A compelling brand story that promises a distinctive experience: Retailers should better establish a strong brand promise that solidifies a core of loyal customers. A high percentage of survey respondents were attracted to brands that tell a story in an engaging manner. Seventy-nine percent of U.S. shoppers say they shop at their favorite retailers/brands because they trust the brand. 
 

  • Customized offers based on totally protected, personal preferences and information: Big data and predictive analytics will help retailers use customer data to increase marketing and sales effectiveness through customizing digital coupons, exclusive content, and social media promotions, among others. However, 37% of U.S. shoppers say they do not use their smartphone for shopping because they are worried about security. Retailers should better safeguard data, by either building their capabilities step-by-step or adding proper capabilities through acquisitions. 
 
  • An enhanced and consistent experience across all devices: Among U.S. survey respondents who do not use their mobile phones or smartphones for shopping, 32% say they do not own mobile/smartphones and 33% said device screens are too small. However, as screen sizes get bigger and more consumers obtain newer mobile devices, mobile shopping will likely accelerate. To prepare for this growth, a total retailer will need to have the technical agility to provide one seamless experience via PC, tablet, mobile phone, in app or web browser. 
 
  • 
Transparency, real time, into a retailer’s inventory: When asked which in-store technologies would make for a better shopping experience, 45% of U.S. survey respondents chose the ability to check other store or online stock quickly. Consumers are looking for actionable inventory information from retailers, pushing retailers to upgrade technology on their supply chain, on how products are tracked, warehoused and distributed. 
 

  • Favorite retailers are everywhere: When asked what they would do if their favorite retailer shut down its local store, 53% of survey respondents noted they would locate the next nearest physical store and 40% said they would increase ordering from their website. Shoppers today assume retailers are everywhere and always connected like themselves, and retailers need to look at store portfolio management more strategically.
 
  • 
To maximize the value of mobile shopping, both store apps and mobile sites must improve: PwC’s survey finds shoppers do not have a strong preference regarding using an app or browser for mobile shopping. When asked how often they use an app and mobile browser for shopping, respondents noted 22% and 28% weekly, respectively, with mobile browser faring a bit higher due to convenience (53% prefer mobile browser because of convenience). Retailers should take note to ensure their mobile site is optimized, while also ramping up apps to improve the experience. 
 

  • Two-way social media engagement: Enthusiasm for social media by retailers and brands is driving consumers to engage, comment and even effect change. When asked what attracted them to a particular brand’s social media site, 61% of U.S. respondents noted attractive deals and promotions, 38% noted new product offerings and 28% said because they shop with the retailer. Retailers should in return better listen to customers on social media, transforming commentary into actionable data for new ideas and improved experience. 
 
  • 
“Brands” act like retailers, and we’ll treat them that way: The gray area of overlap is growing between brands and retailers, and 44% of U.S. survey respondents noted that lower price is the main reason they buy from a brand’s website. Retailers today are partnering with brands/manufacturers to share consumer insights and collaborate on category management to drive more success for both.


 

keyboard_arrow_downCOMMENTS

Leave a Reply

No comments found

TRENDING STORIES

Polls

Which area of the industry do you think Amazon's entry would shake up the most?